Iraq is preparing for 'democratic' elections.
Which America *hopes will see new civilized democray come to the barbaric backwards country full of barbaric backwards islamic-somethings.
America says if the elections are 'democratic' (the candiate that sucks up to America the most is elected) they will pull out of Iraq in August.
What's the point in the Iraqi people voting?
America will only accsept a result that sees someone they want in office.
Their hardly going to let someone who wants to protect Iraqi intrests and create a national-economy or stand up to American bussines into power.
Their going to put their money on so-called 'moderates' and if those modearates fail to get in then they simply don't have to recgonize the election.
So basicly it's democratic if it goes the way America wants it to.
We've already seen Obama's love for democray with his attitude towards the Hondoura's coup which overthrew the (democraticly-elected) leftwing president relpacing him with a milltary goverment.
Then that goverment healed an election (which it controlled) and a conservative was 'elected' thus democray! (In the eye's of the US).
Why would it be any different with these elections?
I guarantee you it won't.
America know's the score it want's the Iraqi people to play their game or no game..
Saturday, March 6, 2010
Wednesday, March 3, 2010
"the oppressive classes litreature" - another reason to dislike Chairman Mao.
during the cultural revoultion (started in 1966) beloeved chairman Mao Tse-tung proclaimed that there bust ben an end to the litreature of the 'oppressive classes' and that socialist-litreature must rule supreme and that the workers *must conforim to this view....(So he forced his style of litreature down their necks and they couldn'r read ANY other type of books).
Mao....That's stupid! Not to mention something that a dictator would do but it's also stupid...I'm not defending capitalism here
but what if the workers wanted to read other books that didn't have a socialist message? I thought socialism was 'for' the workers but no I guess socialist leaders do what they want when they want to. Under a mask of actually giving a shit (when they don't).
Not all books have to have 'capitalist' or 'socialist' messages.
Also Mao got rid of fictional litreature books from the west...Yes Mao the west is fucked up politicaly but you can't just ban westren litreatue..
Again what if the workers WANTED to read it..But no the 'proletariot' read what their told to read...
Mao....That's stupid! Not to mention something that a dictator would do but it's also stupid...I'm not defending capitalism here
but what if the workers wanted to read other books that didn't have a socialist message? I thought socialism was 'for' the workers but no I guess socialist leaders do what they want when they want to. Under a mask of actually giving a shit (when they don't).
Not all books have to have 'capitalist' or 'socialist' messages.
Also Mao got rid of fictional litreature books from the west...Yes Mao the west is fucked up politicaly but you can't just ban westren litreatue..
Again what if the workers WANTED to read it..But no the 'proletariot' read what their told to read...
Sunday, February 28, 2010
Ayatollah Ali Khamenei: US behind the IAEA's claim of Iran's nuclear bomb
Iranian supreme leadear (dictator) Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, said Sunday over Iranian state radio/televsion that the US and it's westren allies were bhind the cliams by the IAEA (see post below for meaning) that Iran was devloping a nuclear bomb.
Khamenei: said that there is no real proof that Iran is bulding a bomb and that it is made up byt the west to try and demonize Iran who have inisted that their enriching uraninum for peaceful puroposes..The IAEA has said it is fearful that Iran might have a bomb.
While Ayatollah Ali Khamenei is a dictator and a religous nut-job (don't get me started on the relgion plus politics thing), I have to admit I think he's right here...I mean the last time America said a country (Iraq) was devloping missioles/bombs it wasn't and that cuased a war...
We are hearing the same rhetoric from the Obama adminstration just focused against different countries...They are ling again!
Khamenei: said that there is no real proof that Iran is bulding a bomb and that it is made up byt the west to try and demonize Iran who have inisted that their enriching uraninum for peaceful puroposes..The IAEA has said it is fearful that Iran might have a bomb.
While Ayatollah Ali Khamenei is a dictator and a religous nut-job (don't get me started on the relgion plus politics thing), I have to admit I think he's right here...I mean the last time America said a country (Iraq) was devloping missioles/bombs it wasn't and that cuased a war...
We are hearing the same rhetoric from the Obama adminstration just focused against different countries...They are ling again!
Saturday, February 27, 2010
Mohamed ElBaradei: "Change will come to Egypt".
ex-president of the IAEA (International atomic energy agency)
Mohamed ElBaradei, now an independent politican and in Egypt said that political and social change is guaranteed to come to come to the country.
Mohamed ElBaradei who has spent almost three decades away from his homeland in Egypt, who has almost been removed from his office in the UN (by America) because he dared to question if Saddam had nuclear missioles in Iraq or not has now said that, Egypt will achieve political change after a 27 year tyranic rule by President Mubarak will be changed.
Mubarak has used the army to crack-down on his oppostion parties and has arrested other groups mainly memembers of the "Muslim Brotherhood" Egypt's most popular oppostion party.
Mubarak has been safe-guarded from condemnation world wide because the US opnely supports Egypt and when people disapper or are arrested before elections the US has a closed tounge policy on those events (because it's much worse when that stuff happens in Iran or Cuba and yet it's ok for it to happen in Egypt).
ElBaradei: has returned to Egypt this week and has been talking to students, reformists and actavists from various groups about reforming the goverment.
The Mubarak regeme has not openly stated any policy towards ElBaradei's actavism but pro-goverment wirters ahve called him a hack and someone who has spent so long out of Egypt that he has become lost with it's 'democratic' system.
(One man ruling for 27 years there you go democray! - Supported by the US).
I don't know about you but I like this man.
(Mohamed ElBaradei) he questioned America (2003)nearly got removed from office by them and is now stnading up to an American backed pusdo-democratic goverment.
I hope his reforms work
down with Mubarak and his regeme!
Mohamed ElBaradei, now an independent politican and in Egypt said that political and social change is guaranteed to come to come to the country.
Mohamed ElBaradei who has spent almost three decades away from his homeland in Egypt, who has almost been removed from his office in the UN (by America) because he dared to question if Saddam had nuclear missioles in Iraq or not has now said that, Egypt will achieve political change after a 27 year tyranic rule by President Mubarak will be changed.
Mubarak has used the army to crack-down on his oppostion parties and has arrested other groups mainly memembers of the "Muslim Brotherhood" Egypt's most popular oppostion party.
Mubarak has been safe-guarded from condemnation world wide because the US opnely supports Egypt and when people disapper or are arrested before elections the US has a closed tounge policy on those events (because it's much worse when that stuff happens in Iran or Cuba and yet it's ok for it to happen in Egypt).
ElBaradei: has returned to Egypt this week and has been talking to students, reformists and actavists from various groups about reforming the goverment.
The Mubarak regeme has not openly stated any policy towards ElBaradei's actavism but pro-goverment wirters ahve called him a hack and someone who has spent so long out of Egypt that he has become lost with it's 'democratic' system.
(One man ruling for 27 years there you go democray! - Supported by the US).
I don't know about you but I like this man.
(Mohamed ElBaradei) he questioned America (2003)nearly got removed from office by them and is now stnading up to an American backed pusdo-democratic goverment.
I hope his reforms work
down with Mubarak and his regeme!
Tuesday, February 23, 2010
is Georgia clamping down on freedom of the press?
Recently independent journalists from inside Georgia have said that the Gerogian goverment is clamping down on press freedom.
The two largest media outlooks in Georgia happen to be goverment owned TV stations.
Other TV, radio or other media sources find it hard to get their views published espically if their views question the 'democratic' Gerogian goverment.
As you can see children if the west says that a country like Georgia is free it most likely is doing something like banning freedom of the press behind closed doors.
Last time I checked that's a violation of free-speech if the two largest media sources are stated owned then the word for that is propaganda.
The two largest media outlooks in Georgia happen to be goverment owned TV stations.
Other TV, radio or other media sources find it hard to get their views published espically if their views question the 'democratic' Gerogian goverment.
As you can see children if the west says that a country like Georgia is free it most likely is doing something like banning freedom of the press behind closed doors.
Last time I checked that's a violation of free-speech if the two largest media sources are stated owned then the word for that is propaganda.
America 'change's ' mission in Iraq and the war's title.
The Obama adminstration has changed the name of the war in Iraq from "Iraqi freedom"
to "operation new dawn". This is set to be introduced in a month or so..
The Obama adminstration says this will change the entire point of view of the war.
and I for once agree it is a new dawn for Iraq the dawn of a puppet goverment that is largely controlled by America!
So they got their ware title right....
to "operation new dawn". This is set to be introduced in a month or so..
The Obama adminstration says this will change the entire point of view of the war.
and I for once agree it is a new dawn for Iraq the dawn of a puppet goverment that is largely controlled by America!
So they got their ware title right....
Thursday, February 18, 2010
Israel has become a dictatorship.
By Prof. Paul Eidelberg
President, Foundation for Constitutional Democracy, Jerusalem
Below are various statements issued by Prime Minister Ariel Sharon and his cabinet ministers, as well as certain actions taken by his government, which indicate that Israel, far from being a democracy, is a democratically elected dictatorship. Let the following facts be submitted to a candid world.
(1) The central issue of the January 2003 national election in Israel was "unilateral disengagement," which involves the evacuation of some 10,000 Jews from their homes and farms in Gaza and northern Samaria and rewarding Arab terrorists with this Jewish and now flourishing land. The Labor Party campaigned for disengagement. The Likud Party, led by Mr. Sharon, campaigned against disengagement.
(2) An overwhelming majority of the public voted for parties that opposed disengagement. Indeed, the Likud won twice as many Knesset seats as Labor -- something unprecedented in Israel's history.
(3) Nevertheless, before the year ended, Prime Minister Sharon adopted Labor's pro-disengagement position!
(4) To gain cabinet approval of disengagement, Mr. Sharon fired two cabinet ministers who opposed his virtual nullification of the January 2003 national election.
(5) When the parties represented by those ministers resigned from his government, Mr. Sharon formed a new government with the Labor Party, a government that was approved by less than a majority of the Knesset.
(6) These unethical acts on the part of Mr. Sharon -- and I have mentioned only a few -- have raised the specter of civil war in Israel. It is widely feared -- and Likud Deputy Prime Minister Ehud Olmert has stoked this fear -- that disengagement will be extended to the "West Bank," hence that 200,000 more Jews will be expelled to facilitate the creation of a Palestinian state.
(7) No less than Lt. Gen. Moshe Ya'alon, IDF Chief of Staff as well as Maj. Gen. Aharon Ze'evi-Farkash, head of IDF Intelligence, and Avi Dichter, director of the Shin Bet (General Security Service), have warned that disengagement will increase Arab terrorism.
(8) Ex-Deputy IDF Intelligence Chief, Maj. Gen. (res.) Yaakov Amidror has publicly declared: "The Israeli government has not succeeded in producing a single serious argument that can refute objections [to "disengagement"] and justify the grave steps that it is taking."
(9) Nevertheless, on February 13, Prime Minister Sharon told his cabinet, "Anyone who speaks or writes against the Disengagement Plan is guilty of incitement."
(10) The next day, Likud Minister of Internal Security, Gideon Ezra, in a live interview on Israel Radio, said that people who shout at ministers should be placed under administrative detention -- which means incarceration up to six months without trial.
(11) Likud Transportation Minister Meir Shitreet told Israel Radio that Likud party members are guilty of incitement when they write letters to Likud MKs informing them that future political support for these politicians is dependent on their voting against the withdrawal/expulsion plan.
(12) MK Effi Eitam said in the Knesset: "I must tell you, Mr. Prime Minister -- and though you are not honoring us with your presence, the words will certainly reach you -- that I have served the country for many years on the battlefield, and during difficult and tense moments, but I have never heard from government elements in the State of Israel such unrestrained incitement as that which was heard from your confidantes and coalition partners... 'Break their bones!' your confidantes whispered, and the headlines blared it. Whose bones precisely do you intend to break, Mr. Prime Minister? Those of little children? Pregnant women? Civilian protestors?"
(13) Undeterred, the cabinet, on February 27, approved Likud Justice Minister Tsipi Livni's proposal to establish a new ministry unit, with 15 full-time lawyers, devoted solely to combating "incitement" and "violence" by disengagement opponents, even though such a unit would add nothing to the ministry's existing law-enforcement capabilities. All it does is discourage legitimate dissent.
(14) Henceforth anti-disengagement protests will be scrutinized far more carefully than other protests, and "borderline cases," which the ministry usually ignores, are liable to be prosecuted where disengagement is involved. This will stifle freedom of expression.
(15) Moreover, the Prison Service Commission has been allocated 19 million shekels to prepare 900 prison spaces for people who disrupt the disengagement. Such otherwise law-abiding citizens will be incarcerated as outright criminals.
(16) The Sharon government has portrayed opponents of disengagement as lunatics and fanatics with whom no normal person would want to be associated -- even though many of the opponents are lawyers, former military officers, professors, rabbis, and former cabinet ministers.
writen in 2003.
President, Foundation for Constitutional Democracy, Jerusalem
Below are various statements issued by Prime Minister Ariel Sharon and his cabinet ministers, as well as certain actions taken by his government, which indicate that Israel, far from being a democracy, is a democratically elected dictatorship. Let the following facts be submitted to a candid world.
(1) The central issue of the January 2003 national election in Israel was "unilateral disengagement," which involves the evacuation of some 10,000 Jews from their homes and farms in Gaza and northern Samaria and rewarding Arab terrorists with this Jewish and now flourishing land. The Labor Party campaigned for disengagement. The Likud Party, led by Mr. Sharon, campaigned against disengagement.
(2) An overwhelming majority of the public voted for parties that opposed disengagement. Indeed, the Likud won twice as many Knesset seats as Labor -- something unprecedented in Israel's history.
(3) Nevertheless, before the year ended, Prime Minister Sharon adopted Labor's pro-disengagement position!
(4) To gain cabinet approval of disengagement, Mr. Sharon fired two cabinet ministers who opposed his virtual nullification of the January 2003 national election.
(5) When the parties represented by those ministers resigned from his government, Mr. Sharon formed a new government with the Labor Party, a government that was approved by less than a majority of the Knesset.
(6) These unethical acts on the part of Mr. Sharon -- and I have mentioned only a few -- have raised the specter of civil war in Israel. It is widely feared -- and Likud Deputy Prime Minister Ehud Olmert has stoked this fear -- that disengagement will be extended to the "West Bank," hence that 200,000 more Jews will be expelled to facilitate the creation of a Palestinian state.
(7) No less than Lt. Gen. Moshe Ya'alon, IDF Chief of Staff as well as Maj. Gen. Aharon Ze'evi-Farkash, head of IDF Intelligence, and Avi Dichter, director of the Shin Bet (General Security Service), have warned that disengagement will increase Arab terrorism.
(8) Ex-Deputy IDF Intelligence Chief, Maj. Gen. (res.) Yaakov Amidror has publicly declared: "The Israeli government has not succeeded in producing a single serious argument that can refute objections [to "disengagement"] and justify the grave steps that it is taking."
(9) Nevertheless, on February 13, Prime Minister Sharon told his cabinet, "Anyone who speaks or writes against the Disengagement Plan is guilty of incitement."
(10) The next day, Likud Minister of Internal Security, Gideon Ezra, in a live interview on Israel Radio, said that people who shout at ministers should be placed under administrative detention -- which means incarceration up to six months without trial.
(11) Likud Transportation Minister Meir Shitreet told Israel Radio that Likud party members are guilty of incitement when they write letters to Likud MKs informing them that future political support for these politicians is dependent on their voting against the withdrawal/expulsion plan.
(12) MK Effi Eitam said in the Knesset: "I must tell you, Mr. Prime Minister -- and though you are not honoring us with your presence, the words will certainly reach you -- that I have served the country for many years on the battlefield, and during difficult and tense moments, but I have never heard from government elements in the State of Israel such unrestrained incitement as that which was heard from your confidantes and coalition partners... 'Break their bones!' your confidantes whispered, and the headlines blared it. Whose bones precisely do you intend to break, Mr. Prime Minister? Those of little children? Pregnant women? Civilian protestors?"
(13) Undeterred, the cabinet, on February 27, approved Likud Justice Minister Tsipi Livni's proposal to establish a new ministry unit, with 15 full-time lawyers, devoted solely to combating "incitement" and "violence" by disengagement opponents, even though such a unit would add nothing to the ministry's existing law-enforcement capabilities. All it does is discourage legitimate dissent.
(14) Henceforth anti-disengagement protests will be scrutinized far more carefully than other protests, and "borderline cases," which the ministry usually ignores, are liable to be prosecuted where disengagement is involved. This will stifle freedom of expression.
(15) Moreover, the Prison Service Commission has been allocated 19 million shekels to prepare 900 prison spaces for people who disrupt the disengagement. Such otherwise law-abiding citizens will be incarcerated as outright criminals.
(16) The Sharon government has portrayed opponents of disengagement as lunatics and fanatics with whom no normal person would want to be associated -- even though many of the opponents are lawyers, former military officers, professors, rabbis, and former cabinet ministers.
writen in 2003.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
